Skip to main content

Just a quick heads up.

 

Having looked at what you have changed and moved into the system I feel the transition and build of the platform for data analysis needs to be constant in the way you build and link things.

Example...Edapps was bought by SC (great acquisition).

Training is now via the Micro eLearning side of the system.

This has its own tab for the right reasons…

Get that and it should. Don't have an issue with what it is and what it does.

 

However.

THe platform does have an area that is the brains for data collation and manipulation and this needs to remain the same area.

Here Dashboards and visulas for simple analysis and review / validation can be custom built via the Early Release of Dashboards.

This also needs to include being able to pull Training Data into a Dashboard.

 

WHY?
Because it is all linked to the planning, scheduling, monitoring, activities checks, site checks, process checks, actions created, issues raised training required, credentials expanded and so on.

So whether the Dashboard relates to Weather,Quality, Processes, Employees, Contractors, Inductions COMPETENCE (SKATE Skills, Knowledge Attitude, Training, Experience) it is interlinked into an autonomous way of planning and checking with proving.

So please link up what you are developing for the end Orgs and Customers in order that they can tailor all the leading and lagging indicators which will improve the Culture of what and how they do their business.

 

It also assists with compliance. 

To be continued

Hey John, apologies for the late response and thank you for your comments here!

I hear where you are coming from here and want to make sure I am understanding correctly to funnel this back to the relevant teams internally… that said, am I correct in understanding that what you’re asking is for the ability to support/link training data in Analytics section of the platform, to help close gaps specific to where training is linked to points raised through issues, assets, scheduling, etc? Thanks 😀

Yes having the system autonomous.

So it all links back to the templates, inspections, failed items and actions.

 

By undertaking checks we will normally find gaps.

 

If this is within an automated system then we can start to understand what the underlying issues are and devise methods to proactively address these as part of a compliance system.

 

With regards to your other email ref specialists.

 

We can then address local legislation via a legislation register in order to look at current and new regulations and standards and this start improvements to autonomous compliance.

 

Ta John

Thanks for your reply John, you raise some great points here - I can certainly see the value in an autonomous system for improved compliance regulation and management. Let me funnel this to the relevant teams internally and get back to you on where things stand. Thanks in advance of your patience 👍🏼

Thanks for your patience John! I’ve been chatting with the relevant team internally who have confirmed that this is something they’re definitely working towards in the future… likely towards end of year/early next year (however timelines are subject to change). The first point of call is getting SC training fully integrated in our SC tech infrastructure, then from there, they can properly look into syncing training analytics with the ‘new’ analytics. Stay tuned 👀

Terms & ConditionsCookie settings